Impact of Subsidy Removal by President Bola Tinubu on Small-Scale Industries in Nigeria: Analysis, Mitigation Strategies, and Recommendations


President Bola Tinubu’s decision to remove subsidies in Nigeria marks a significant shift in the country’s economic policies. Subsidy removal is a complex and controversial subject, particularly for small-scale industries that rely heavily on affordable energy and transportation costs. This analysis aims to provide industry players in Nigeria with insightful analysis, identify the effects of subsidy removal on small-scale industries, propose mitigation measures, and offer recommendations to navigate this transition effectively.


Subsidies have traditionally played a crucial role in supporting various sectors of Nigeria’s economy, including small-scale industries. They have helped mitigate the burden of high energy costs and transportation expenses, ensuring the competitiveness and profitability of these enterprises. However, the decision by President Bola Tinubu to remove subsidies necessitates a thorough examination of their implications on small-scale industries and the subsequent challenges they may face.

Analysis of the Effect of Subsidy Removal:

Increased Operational Costs: Subsidy removal will likely lead to an immediate surge in fuel prices, resulting in higher energy costs for small-scale industries. This increase in operational expenses can strain profit margins, making it challenging for these enterprises to maintain their competitiveness.

Inflationary Pressure: The removal of subsidies often triggers a chain reaction, causing a rise in the prices of goods and services across the board. Small-scale industries heavily rely on raw materials and inputs from larger industries. As their costs increase, these small enterprises may need to help maintain affordable prices, potentially leading to reduced demand and lower revenues.

Transportation Challenges: Small-scale industries often face logistical hurdles, and higher fuel prices can exacerbate this issue. With subsidy removal, transportation costs are likely to escalate, making it more expensive to transport goods and materials. This can disrupt supply chains, delay deliveries, and negatively impact the overall efficiency of small-scale industries.

Market Competition: Subsidy removal may disproportionately affect small-scale industries compared to their larger counterparts. Larger industries often have more robust financial capabilities to absorb increased costs, while smaller enterprises may need help to remain competitive. This could lead to market consolidation, with larger players gaining a stronger foothold and potentially stifling the growth of small-scale industries.

Summary of Discussion:

The removal of subsidies by President Bola Tinubu has the potential to create significant challenges for small-scale industries in Nigeria. These challenges include increased operational costs, inflationary pressure, transportation difficulties, and intensified market competition. It is crucial for industry players to understand these potential effects and proactively address them to ensure their continued growth and success.


While the removal of subsidies presents substantial challenges, it is essential to acknowledge that this policy shift aims to address long-term economic sustainability and reduce fiscal strain on the government. Small-scale industries must adapt to these changes and take proactive measures to mitigate the potential adverse effects.


Enhance Efficiency and Cost Optimization: Small-scale industries should focus on improving operational efficiency, exploring alternative energy sources, and adopting cost optimization strategies to offset increased expenses resulting from subsidy removal.

Diversify Product Offerings: Exploring new product lines or diversifying existing ones can help small-scale industries maintain competitiveness and adapt to changing market dynamics caused by subsidy removal.

Strengthen Collaboration and Partnerships: Collaborative efforts among small-scale industries can lead to resource sharing, joint procurement, and economies of scale, mitigating the impact of increased costs and fostering resilience.

Government Support and Policy Interventions: The government should consider implementing targeted support programs, such as grants, subsidies, or tax incentives, to cushion the impact of subsidy removal on small-scale industries. This support can aid in technology adoption, skills development, and market access.

Investing in Infrastructure: Addressing transportation challenges through improved infrastructure, such as road networks and logistics facilities, can help reduce costs and enhance the efficiency of small-scale industries.

Example: To illustrate the recommendation for collaboration, small-scale textile manufacturers can join forces to negotiate better rates for raw material procurement, collectively invest in shared production facilities, and collectively market their products to gain a more substantial market presence.

By adopting these mitigation strategies and recommendations, small-scale industries in Nigeria can navigate the challenges of subsidy removal and continue to thrive in an evolving economic landscape.

About NASSI.

The Nigerian Association of Small-Scale Industrialists is Nigeria’s umbrella body of small-scale industrialists. Join us to benefit from training, financial support and other government interventions., 08036130044.

Leave a Comment